Navigating Singapore’s tax landscape
In this country-specific Q&A, we provide an overview of tax laws and regulations applicable in Singapore.
Anticipate risk, prepare your position and resolve disputes with confidence

Identifying potential issues early can give businesses more options to manage risk, strengthen supporting evidence and avoid unnecessary escalation. Where a dispute does arise, a clear strategy from the outset can be critical to protecting the business and achieving an effective and sustainable resolution.
Our tax specialists work closely with businesses and individuals to manage dispute lifecycle proactively and efficiently. Combining technical tax knowledge with practical experience of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) reviews and dispute procedures, we help minimise disruption, manage risk and maintain constructive engagement with the tax authorities.
The best time to consider how a tax position would withstand scrutiny is often before an enquiry begins.
Businesses may have material tax positions that involve significant judgement, complex facts or evolving tax rules. In other situations, changes to business models, transactions or historical practices may create areas of uncertainty that have not previously been examined.
We help clients identify and address potential areas of controversy before they escalate.
Our support can include:
Taking action early does not necessarily mean conceding a position. It allows management to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the position, preserve relevant evidence and make informed decisions before a dispute develops.


IRAS may conduct audits, reviews and investigations across a range of tax areas. These reviews often require businesses to provide detailed documentation and support for historical tax positions. Early engagement can often help businesses address issues efficiently and reduce the risk of disputes escalating.
Our team helps clients:
Tax errors and reporting omissions can arise for a variety of reasons, including changes in business operations, evolving tax interpretations or historical compliance issues.
Where appropriate, making a voluntary disclosure to IRAS may help reduce potential penalties and demonstrate a proactive approach to compliance.
We assist clients with:


Where a taxpayer disagrees with an assessment or position taken by IRAS, the available options should be considered in the context of both the immediate dispute and its wider implications.
A disputed position may affect multiple years, recurring transactions or tax positions in other jurisdictions. For cross-border matters, an adjustment may also result in double taxation.
We assist clients in evaluating and pursuing the appropriate route to resolution.
Our support can include:
Our focus is on helping clients reach a technically supportable and commercially sustainable resolution while managing disruption to the business.
Our team brings extensive local experience in tax compliance and dispute resolution, enabling us to navigate complex matters with confidence.
For cross border disputes, access to the Grant Thornton international network allows us to coordinate with specialists in relevant jurisdictions and consider the dispute from a broader international perspective.
Complex disputes may require expertise across different areas of tax, transfer pricing, economics and financial analysis. We bring together the relevant specialists around the issues involved rather than approaching the matter through a single technical lens.
This breadth of capability has also been recognised externally. Grant Thornton Singapore was named a finalist in the 2026 International Tax Review Asia-Pacific Tax Awards for Singapore Tax Disputes Advisory Firm of the Year, Singapore Transfer Pricing Advisory Firm of the Year and Singapore Tax Advisory Firm of the Year.
No two tax disputes are the same. We take the time to understand your circumstances and develop solutions that align with your business. Our goal is to help you resolve issues efficiently and constructively, mitigating risks and reducing disruption to your business.
Tax disputes can require different specialists at different stages.
Tax advisers bring detailed understanding of the underlying tax position, transactions, financial information and economic analysis. Legal counsel may bring complementary expertise in legal interpretation, privilege considerations, procedural strategy and advocacy.
Where legal counsel is involved, we work collaboratively as part of an integrated team. We can work with your existing legal advisers or, where you do not have an existing legal adviser, draw on our established relationships with experienced independent tax lawyers and facilitate introductions to cousel with the appropriate expertise for the matter.
Ideally, before substantive positions are communicated to the tax authority. Early involvement allows the relevant facts, technical arguments, supporting evidence and wider implications to be assessed before the business becomes committed to a particular response or strategy.
It is important to understand the scope of the review and the underlying issues that IRAS may be examining. Responses should be accurate, complete and supported by appropriate documentation, but it is also important to consider whether the information requested could have implications for other tax positions, periods or jurisdictions.
Yes. Taxpayers may object to an assessment where they believe the tax position is incorrect, provided the objection is submitted within the prescribed timelines.
A voluntary disclosure involves proactively notifying IRAS of tax errors or omissions before they are identified by the tax authority.
The timeline will depend on the complexity of the issues involved, the availability of supporting documentation and the extent of engagement required with IRAS.
Not every dispute can be avoided. However, businesses can reduce controversy risk by identifying material tax issues early, maintaining appropriate contemporaneous evidence and documentation, reviewing potentially contentious positions and, where appropriate, using certainty mechanisms such as advance rulings or Advance Pricing Agreements.
In this country-specific Q&A, we provide an overview of tax laws and regulations applicable in Singapore.
In this article, we explore how digital asset exchanges, wallet providers and custodians can assess GST treatment across token activity, service income and customer location.
In this article, Alejandro Ces and Alex Yam draw on insights from transfer pricing practitioners across the Asia Pacific region to examine how transfer pricing adjustments are treated in practice. Their analysis includes customs, indirect tax, withholding tax and double taxation implications.